Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Poetry Through the Authors' Eyes

I know I'm not the only one to have struggled with Blake or Wordsworth - and I certainly won't be the last - but while reading a few of their poems, I found it immensely helpful to have an image that somewhat depicted what they were writing about alongside the text. The images I pulled up on each poem added vivid detail to their descriptions (I'm a bit of a visual learner, myself) and led me to a whole different level of understanding while perusing their works.

I would just like to share a few of these pictures for anyone who wanted to read through Blake's "The Chimney Sweeper" (both Songs of Innocence and Songs of Experience versions).
This picture gives a little more feeling to Songs of Innocence's "The Chimney Sweeper." Personally, I saw this and pictured it to be the embodiment of Tom Dacre; in the face of a hard life and certain death, the boy in this picture still has a smile on his face. In "The Chimney Sweeper," Tom was spoken to by an angel who told him to do be a good boy and (implicitly) do his job without complaint. The angel said when he passed on, he'd have God for his father and never be sad.

This picture portrays a completely different spin on chimney sweeps. It gives us a view of chimney sweeps close to Blake's "The Chimney Sweeper" in Songs of Experience. In this picture, we're shown how sad and woeful the profession of chimney sweeping was. Note how not a single boy is smiling in the picture. Side by side with Experiences "The Chimney Sweeper," it loans a powerful image to Blake's words; it's as if he's describing any one of these boy's lives. 

An interesting article about the life of chimney sweepers can be found here.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

When reading through Wordsworth's poetry, I definitely had a desire to see with my own eyes what he was describing. I did some searching and pulled up a few images to go alongside with "Lines Written A Few Miles Above Tintern Abbey" and "Composed Upon Westminster Bridge, Sept. 3, 1803."

This photo is actually a picture of Tintern Abbey from the hills a few miles out - an almost exact representation of what I believe Wordsworth saw and wrote about. It's just a nice accompaniment to have alongside the poem.


Westminster Bridge is a wide bridge that crosses the Thames, connecting Westminster and Lambeth. This is a view of Parliament from the bridge - undoubtedly the part of London Wordsworth was looking back upon - and we can see that it is an early morning, before the bustle of life awakens. Try picturing this to be Wordsworth's picture, and immediately after he took this, he began to write. It's a cool thought.

In any regard, I highly advise trying to find images to accompany many of the Romantic era poems. It's helpful to try to see what the authors were seeing when they wrote, and really leads to a better understanding of the poetry.

Monday, February 20, 2012

The Concept of Gentleman: What it means to be a Gentleman in Jane Austen's "Emma"

After reading Jane Austen's Emma I began to think more on what it meant to be a "gentleman" during Austen's time.

A gentleman is described as a man who's courteous, honorable, and chivalrous and is of a good social standing, as well as wealthy. At least that's how they seem to appear in Jane Austen's world. Men who are sophisticated and know how to make a woman feel downright giddy. I wanted to do some research on this, on the gentlemen who charmed us in Emma. Luckily I came across the same question, "What Makes a Gentleman?" written by a member of the Jane Austen Society of Australia.

The small article focuses on the topic of gentleman, such as Mr. Knightley, who's the prime example of the worthy title, and Mr. Frank Churchill, who's immediately well liked but there's something about his behavior that have us question whether or not he is a gentleman. At first I thought Mr. Knightley didn't have the charming qualities of a gentleman as Frank Churchill did. Between the two, though, I thought Mr. Knightley's convention was much more trustworthy and I came to like him more because he had everyone's best interest at heart.

Within the article the writer further discusses on the actualities of the society Jane Austern herself was a part of. Giving examples of how 18th century traits of gentleman carried over to the 19th century society. Saying how a true gentleman wouldn't be a coward and tell a lie, that was something no one would respect and we see that in Austen's Emma when it is revealed that Frank Churchill was a liar the entire time. There's nothing considered honorable in a man who fails to tell the truth to others.

The remainder of the article is filled with good, hard facts of the wealthy and social desires of those people during those times. I found it to be very enlightening and made me realize that Jane Austen wasn't too fond on 19th century gentleman and mixed the best things of the two centuries, 18th and 19th, into one to create the reputable gentleman into this written work and as well as her other works.

The other links in this website was very fun to read, also, because it has more discussions on Emma and other Jane Austen's novels.

Monday, February 13, 2012

Recognition and Ridicule: Defining the Highs and Lows of Fame in Felicia Herman’s “Woman and Fame”


Recognition and Ridicule: Defining the Highs and Lows of Fame in Felicia Herman’s “Woman and Fame”

 

            A little part in all of us wants or dreams to be famous. We strive and wish to be recognized for all of our hard work and achievements. Felicia Hemans’s poem “Woman and Fame” shows a woman’s bittersweet battle with fame and what it entitles to women in her era. Not only does she show her need and yearning for recognition in her field of writing, but also explains to the reader the darker truth of fame, of what one, especially women, would have to endure at the price of achieving a high status as a literary figure. The question that I have conjured from this poem is if fame with all of its publicity, riches, and it’s golden access to everything you could ever want worth the ridicule, and consistent stabbings of critics who wish to see you fail? Is the stress of being in the eye of the public where every step you make is calculated and ever so indelicately observed, worth it? Hemans answer is clear, yet her poem still stands in the middle, for whichever choice you choose, in a way you still lose.

            In the paraphrase before the actual poem, Hemans is building up what you are about to read. She backs up her first stanza by explaining how fame brings happiness in full:

Happy—happier far than thou,

With the laurel on thy brow;

She that makes the humblest hearth,

Lovely but to one on earth.

                        (1-4, paraphrase)

            Here Hemans is paraphrasing one of her poems, “Corinne at the Capitol”. Perhaps by mixing the lines from this poem with “With the laurel on they brow” (2), signifies how her poetry has brought her fame. Poets were originally honored with crowns of laurel after they were recognized for their talents. Hemans is trying to say how very happy she is to be honored for her poetry, a happiness that cannot be compared to anyone else’s happiness. Her happiness that she has received is “lovely but to one”, meaning that it is a rare honor, that comes to the few who deserve it on earth. From an initial reading and with the paraphrasing from her other poetry it is initially safe to say she is speaking about herself and her honor.

            Upon reading the first stanza of the poem it looks like Hemans is speaking directly to fame personifying it. The feeling of this stanza is mixed, it feels as if Hemans if putting fame on a pedestal, one in which she cannot reach. This is completely contradictory to the paraphrase before.

Thou hast a charmed cup, O Fame!

A draught that mantels high

And seems to lift this earthly frame

        Above mortality.

Away! To me—a woman—bring

Sweet waters from affection’s spring.

                                                (1-6)

            Lines 1-4 are evidence that Hemans is in a way praising fame. It is something godly and above mortality. In the third stanza she states that fame “seems to lift this earthly frame” which makes me believe that the fame is hers changing her mortal vulnerable form into something untouchable. She speaks the truth; fame brings a sense of immortality, even when a figure of importance dies they have printed themselves in history to forever be remembered. Perhaps this is what Hemans wishes to obtain from fame. All of the empowerment in the first four lines leaves the last two lines perplexing.

Away! To me—a woman—bring

Sweet waters from affection’s spring.

            Now it seems like Hemans is trying to say that either she wishes and yearns for this fame to be away from her, so that she can return to a mortal, normal state, or that this fame is too godly for her, a woman, to have. Perhaps it’s a little of both. As evidence from the first few lines goes it is clear she praises fame, but at the same time her words feel submissive. I believe she feels that her and her fame are two different beings. She has almost become a servant of her own fame. She has separated herself from the thing she has so yearned to have possibly realizing that it’s not as great as it looks to be. This can be proved from woman in literature from her history. Yes she was recognized for her talents but also ridiculed for being a woman in poetry. Fame for women also came with a price one that seems to have taken a toll on Hemans in this first stanza.

            The praise and yearning continues in the second stanza. She brings back the symbol of the wreath of laurels; the last three lines hold an abundant proof that Hemans fame is not the kind of fame she was looking for:

Heroes have smiles in death;

Give me from some kind hand a flower

The record of one happy hour!

                                    (10-12)

            When war heroes return home they get the upmost respect and recognition. No one is putting them down or ridiculing them, all people are happy and cheer for them, and never think twice about weather what they had done was wrong. This is the kind of fame that Hemans wants. It seems as if the wreath of flowers was never something that she had gotten, but one she knows she deserves.

            In the fourth stanza she shows the second half of what fame brings the ridicule. She uses words such as “mockery”, “sick”, and “sympathy” to show her heartache. Lastly she says “For tender accents that are gone” (24). This shows that their once was a time where she didn’t have to deal with people ridiculing her, but now that’s all but gone.

            The last stanza answers my questions above. Hemans thinks that fame shouldn’t rule us and it shouldn’t be the thing to control our choices in life, nor rule what we love to do. We shouldn’t turn to fame to fix out answers or our lives, because no matter how much money or publicity we gain, there is always a bad side to every situation, and fame brings the worst out of all people. Fame should not be the cool fountain we need to drink from or the prop that holds and controls what we write and feel. We must make out own choices and life our lives how they are meant to be, and if fame comes our way we shouldn’t drown in it but attempt to benefit from it. Hopefully, we don’t lose ourselves along the way.

Sunday, February 5, 2012

John Keats' "What I Have Fears That I May Cease to Be"

“What I Have Fears That I May Cease to Be”
John Keats

[1] When I have fears that I may cease to be
[2] Before my pen has gleaned my teeming brain,
[3] Before high piled books, in charact’ry,
[4] Hold like rich garners the full ripened grain;
[5] When I behold, upon the night’s starred face,
[6] Huge cloudy symbols of a high romance,
[7] And think that I may never live to trace
[8] Their shadows with the magic hand of chance;
[9] And when I feel, fair creature of an hour,
[10] That I shall never look upon thee more,
[11] Never have relish in the fairy power
[12] Of unreflecting love—then on the shore
[13] Of the wide world I stand alone, and think
[14] Till love and fame to nothingness do sink.

This poem could either be interpreted as a writer losing his muse that shapes him or as a man who’s heartbroken. At the start of the poem we know that the speaker is despondent. In lines 1 to 4 he miserably begins with explaining his struggle to express what’s in his head into words (i.e. “charact’ry”). It could mean that he’s afraid he’ll die before he’ll be the writer he wishes himself to be or that he’s afraid that he’ll die before he can ever say anything, ever say what he truly feels.

[1] When I have fears that I may cease to be
[2] Before my pen has gleaned my teeming brain,
[3] Before high piled books, in charact’ry,
[4] Hold like rich garners the full ripened grain;

He’s daydreaming, looking up at the stars and thinking of the possibility of being with the someone his loves under that night sky rather than being in the state of mind he’s presently in. Except that tiny moment of happiness drifts away from him as he states in line 7 and 8:

[7] And think that I may never live to trace
[8] Their shadows with the magic hand of chance;

Perhaps it’s suggesting that he may never be able to relive those magical moments he shared with his lost love. Those moments are gone in the darkness. The following lines, 11 and 12, “Fairy power of unreflecting love,” could be interpreted as him still or was in love with someone and they didn’t love him in return. As if he’s under some sort of spell that has brought to this dismal state.

What lines that partially hint that he’s in heartache are lines 9 and 10 where he goes on to say, “when I feel, fair creature of an hour, that I shall never look upon thee more.” He could be saying directly to his “creature of an hour,” or his present love, that he’s saddened that he’ll never see her again. This explains that he’s hurt because of whatever happened between him and his love he’ll never get see her again and feel that love– and knowing that is painful.

Lines 12 to 14 is a kind of sweet surrender. He’s providing the reader with a visualization:

[12] Of unreflecting love—then on the shore
[13] Of the wide world I stand alone, and think
[14] Till love and fame to nothingness do sink.

He’s given up. It’s all meaningless and he feels alone in this horrible feeling he’s under. Everything has fallen apart and it’s all nothing in the end. He’s in obvious torment, sinking so low in his depression and looking deep inside himself, realizing that he is the one on the brink and ready to just quit everything. His thought is “what’s the point or going on if I’ll never feel love or be in love again?” After acknowledging this he knows there’s nothing more he can do about it.

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

The Reverie of "Poor" Susan: Financially or Emotionally?



William Wordsworths poem, “A Reverie of Poor Susan”, is one that is full of dream like images while still having a bitter tone. At first glimpse of the title, I assumed that the speaker, Susan, was financially deprived seeing as she was described as “poor”. After critically analyzing the poem, it was significant that Susan seemed to be bereaved and full of depression. I then began to decide whether or not Susan is poor economically, or emotionally.

In the poem, we see that Susan may be economically poor for a handful of reasons. In the first line of the poem, we see that Susan is “at the corner or Wood Street”. Although I am not familiar with the streets of England, my professor informed my class and I that this is a street in an urban, impoverished area of London. So right from the beginning, we see Susan walking around in a poor part of the city which is most likely where she is living. Her location also makes her seem financially poor in line eight where she states that she was looking around “Cheapside”. Now again, I am not aware of the streets of London, but just the name, Cheapside, gives a clue that this part of the city is “cheap” or poor.

Susan may also be financially poor because of the growth of the cities in England. In her dream like states in lines eleven and twelve, Susan is seeing the “small cottage” which is “the only one dwelling on Earth that she loves”. In my opinion, Susan seems to have lived in the rural part of England before moving to the city. This was where the cottage was, and like many others, was forced to move to the urban part of England so she could make money. Most people in England who lived in the rural parts were farmers and hen cities began to grow, they were not doing as well as they had before. This, of course, forced them to move to the city so they could provide for themselves and their families.

It is also a possibility that Susan was emotionally “poor” and that this feeling had nothing to do with finances or money. She may have just been sad that she is not living in that cottage she loved so much in the rural area. She may also had been forced to move to the city (which I am sure made many people sad), and was depressed because of the big change of her live. Susan was most likely depressed because she was not living a urban life and her heart was no longer in heaven like it was when she thought about her rural life.